Teaching in Ontario: Observations for a Broken System

Why do we have so many underemployed teachers in Ontario?

May 13, 2008 · 10 Comments

It has been a challenge to decide where to start this criticism of the current state of teacher employment in Ontario. I do want to discuss the front line problems with hiring, but a lot of those idiosyncrasies are the same ones that exist in every business that has ever existed. To understand why it is so challenging to obtain employment as a teacher in Ontario I think one must first look at simple economic principles of supply and demand. In Ontario there are currently to many teachers for the number of positions available — supply is dramatically out pacing demand. This leads to an obvious question: why are teacher preparation programs continuing to increase enrolment for an already saturated industry, or better still, why are students continuing to enter a profession that currently yields a 41% chance of finding regular employment?

One thing that could be said is that if the teacher employment crisis ever rights itself Ontario will be well served by teachers who want to teach, because it should be a safe assumption that those who enter a profession with such a bleak outlook for employment must really love their job. I do question how many of these new teachers grasp the true state of the employment situation. It is my assumption that no one is telling these potential students how difficult it is to find employment, and that these new teachers are making decisions based on old outdated employment data. Speaking from personal experience I can say that I was aware of the employment struggles, but I was lead to believe they existed in elementary school and the arts. As an intermediate/senior science teacher I’d have no problem securing a full time position at the first presented opportunity. Add to that the fact that I’d be willing to work in any school board in Ontario and I should have principles knocking down my door. I can now confirm that this was not the case, and all disciplines are essentially saturated with teachers. The data I was reading may have been true three years ago, but in 2008 it held no water.

The Ontario College of Teachers printed an article ‘Emerging employment crisis for new English-language teachers‘ in the December 2007 issue of their magazine Professionally Speaking. They report the grim statistics facing newly graduated teachers in Ontario. In 2000 there were 8,857 newly approved teachers in Ontario (from Ontario training programs, American border training programs, and International programs). These teachers were faced with a retiring teacher population that was creating some 7,096 positions, a difference of 1,761. Those 1,761 teachers would be able to find supply positions that could turn into contracts or full time work. Fast forward to 2006 data, where we now have some 12,434 newly trained teachers and only an estimated 5,325 retiring teachers, leaving 7,109 teachers seeking employment. Add to those numbers the recent announcement that 60 of the 72 school boards in Ontario are experiencing declining enrolment, and the question continues to be: why do we have so many teachers?

I have no data but I hear in conversation that teacher training programs in Ontario continue to increase enrolment. The anti-establishment retort is that they are in business to make money, so if students want to throw away $8,000 we’ll be happy to help them do that. There is a definite push from students who want to get into these programs, but at some point a line must be drawn and enrolment must be cut to get the employment crisis in line. Many people blame the acceptance of American and International trained teachers as the problem, but I think this is a short sighted critique. Some Ontario students consider these options for their offer of living life in a different culture, and being able to bring that experience back to Ontario to incorporate into their teaching. To deny students this option would be a blow to the country Canada is perceived to be on the world stage. So what is the answer? I think it has to start with an honest discussion of the current state of teaching in Ontario, and letting students know that it will be a challenge to find employment, that they will be lucky to get supply work, and they will have to win the lottery to get a full time position. If you really want to teach then go forth and fight the good fight, but if this is just something that you are doing to extend your time in school, or as a fall back, then perhaps you should consider a different course of action.

We could have worse problems than to many teachers. It is difficult to complain and try and place blame on a group of people who want to teach, who want to care, and who want to prepare and educate the next generation of Canadians.

Categories: education
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

10 responses so far ↓

  • Rob // June 16, 2008 at 1:08 am

    Great article. You’ve really nailed all the key points. I just finished my B. Ed. I think it’s a great time for education in Ontario! The provincial government is providing lots of funding and the over-supply of teachers means great talent is being infused into the system. Anyone who sticks around for a few years will get into the system eventually. My advice for students thinking about a B.Ed : have a backup job lined up for when you get out!!

  • Mark // July 22, 2008 at 3:11 pm

    Unfortunately I think the simple laws of supply and demand have been drastically distorted by the contracts negotiated between unions and governments. The existing package of compensation, benefits, holidays, work hours, and job security are too hard to turn away from even if the prospects of a job are low. The numbers speak from themselves. The job is attracting far too many people and it is a major problem, not only for those unable to find work in the profession, but also for taxpayers and the economy as a whole. Jobs that offer the package that teaching does rarely exist anymore and unfortunately it will take a very strong, principled government to admit the problem let along fix the situation.

  • Devalina Mitra // August 16, 2008 at 1:39 am

    Many think teaching is an easy job and get attracted by the holidays that teachers enjoy(?) It is only after graduating that they realize the scenario for suitable employment is bleak. Teacher Colleges should reduce the number of seats, so that all graduates get an opportunity to get employment. Why should they have to wait for three years? Does an engineer or doctor have to wait that long? Besides Buffalo is making good business and is inviting anyone to study as long as they can meet the financial costs. This has resulted in the increase of teachers.OCT should also restrict certification to Internationally trained teachers (since they cannot with Canadian educated ones) and save them from frustration and increase the quota according to the teacher demand. All these factors are controlled I am sure teachers will not have to wait for long.

  • PUTW (Private unorganized taxpaying worker) // August 16, 2008 at 8:19 pm

    Having an impeccable command of the English language might help. I saw some small but unforgivable errors in your post.

    But I am not the grammar police since I make similar mistakes myself.

    Now, I think you are dead… that’s right dead wrong, my friend. Union militias and particularly the OSSTF (Ontario’s state sanctioned tyrannical fascists) are totally responsible for this situation.

    Theoretically we live in a free market system but if you or any other B.Ed grad who’s got the bureaucracy of education ticket wants to teach AND is willing to accept less than the union militia’s minimum wage, it is illegal for the board to employ you.

    This has lead to 3 huge problems.
    1. Union criminals (all the other teachers) are a protected industry that has created victims out of qualified graduates and immigrants. Keep the gravy train rockin or else… strike.

    2. Students end up with teachers that may not be the most qualified and since there’s a finite amount of money to go around, students suffer from having too few teachers to give them attention.

    3. Taxpayers pay for less than acceptable teachers who can’t spell well, don’t know their math, and collect paycheque after paycheque, yet nothing short of molesting a kid would get them fired. Whereas, as a software developer I’d be fired if I were to even flinch at something hard to do.

    Perhaps you should fight the OSSTF rather than salivating at the idea of joining them.

  • Devalina Mitra // August 18, 2008 at 12:33 am

    I too noticed some minor errors . They were written in a rush and not checked before posting. It is definitely not due to ignorance.
    Also let me tell you-Canadians (born Caucasian Canadians) have that weapon of criticizing grammatical errors, when there isn’t anything to pounce upon. Many CGA’s and Engineers holding top notch jobs have the same opinion. When people are devoid of knowledge and subject matter that is the only area they can attack.
    Neverthe less, thank you so much for pointing out my errors. I truly appreciate it. By the way, I do have a Masters (with honours standing ) from a US university (not Buffalo).

  • PUTW (Private unorganized taxpaying worker) // August 21, 2008 at 10:44 pm

    when there isn’t anything to pounce upon.

    Well Devalina, I think your blog is a service to aspiring teachers. And, you’ve completely missed the point of my comment if you think I was criticizing your English.

    I pounced on the union, the education system, and the bureaucracy. Your blog lists a few things you find to be unfair / predatory practices in the education industry in Ontario which is nothing but a criminal and a grotesque monopoly with janitors, unions, VPs, and admin staff running away with 90%+ of the ministry budget. If anything, you ought to attack them to let students, aspiring teachers, and parents know where the fault lies.

    The minute you say something about the OSSTF, the nepotism, the corruption, and the trustees, you would have earned a lot more credibility than by simply saying something about “Apply to education”, false demand stats, or evil premiers (big anti-MH propaganda in schools)

  • Kate // October 14, 2008 at 9:53 pm

    Come and work in Western Australia, heaps of opportunity great experience. see http://www.det.wa.edu.au

  • Devalina Mitra // October 27, 2008 at 2:15 am

    I really wish I could, had I known that a few years earlier. At the age of 50 and establishing myself in three countries, I have run out of energy and am apprehensive of the outcome.

  • Rob // June 12, 2009 at 11:09 am

    one solution that may help is STOP the retired teachers from taking supply/Contract jobs and give the new teachers a chance. Pension and Pay?? last time I looked double dipping was illegal

  • Jeff // August 11, 2009 at 8:38 pm

    The teaching situation is a mess. I am a recent B.Ed graduate who has many years of volunteer and emergency supply teaching experience before I entered teachers college. I became certified just recently, and had to give up my emergency supply status – at least then I had lots of work even if I was uncertified. Yet my employee number will always be the same. You would think that the logical thing to do is for the board to switch me from uncertified status to certified – the employee number will be the same anyway. Now that I am certified, I am treated as someone who has never seen the inside of an elementary classroom. I was trusted to supply teach all the elementary grades when I was uncertified, but now it doesn’t seem to count for anything. This is very demoralizing. My only hope to get on the supply teaching list is to get the principals who know me, and like me, to vouch for me by calling the tdsb. And that will not guarantee that I will be placed on the occasional list – it will only enable an interview at the board.

Leave a Comment